Archive for October 2006
This is sad news. I doubt very much what the US and Pakistani governments are saying. US Inteligence isn’t worth much in my opinion.
U.S. blamed for attack on school
PAKISTAN CALLS TARGET AL-QAIDA TRAINING CAMP
By Paul Garwood
Associated Press
Islamic leaders and Al-Qaida-linked militants blamed the United States for an airstrike Monday on a religious school and called for nationwide demonstrations to condemn the attack that flattened the school — known as a madrasah — and ripped apart those inside.
Furious villagers and religious leaders said the pre-dawn missile barrage carried out by Pakistani helicopter gunships killed students and teachers.
Pakistani military officials said the school was a front for an Al-Qaida training camp. Eighty people were killed in the country’s deadliest military operation targeting suspected terrorists.
Pakistan used intelligence provided by U.S.-led forces in Afghanistan in the raid, but American forces did not fire any missiles, Pakistan’s army spokesman said today.
Maj. Gen. Shaukat Sultan declined to say how much help was provided by U.S.-led coalition forces for Monday’s attack.
“Intelligence sharing was definitely there, but to say they (the coalition) have carried out the operation, that is absolutely wrong,” Sultan told the Associated Press.
Among those killed in the attack in the remote northwestern village of Chingai, two miles from the Afghan border, was a cleric who had sheltered militants in the past and was believed to be associated with Al-Qaida’s No. 2 leader, Ayman al-Zawahiri.
Some of you may have heard about her death. She was a young mother (38 yrs.) of 6 children and was shot in cold blood while with her 3 year old and picking up her other children. This has shocked the city of Fremont. It is interesting to read the various articles for various reasons: sheik Hamza Yusuf attended her funeral; a group of elder Afghanis opposed the public aspect of her family’s acceptance of public mourning; and women wearing the hijab out of support and respect.
There is no motive found yet. Only a person of interest held for another reason. Everyone is assuming it is a hate crime, but hoping it is an act of randomness.
It is tragic.
I guess I am posting it because it shows how an ethinic group gets assimilated into the US. Compromises and sensitivity. For example, one of the elders came to the funeral with the promise that it would be quiet and no slogans, etc.
Please put their family — especially those six young children — in your prayers or thoughts… . There are also links within the articles to help the family.
Here are a couple of links:
In solidarity, hundreds mourn Fremont mother shot to death
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercuryn … 871853.htm
Victim’s family urged to refuse outside comfort
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercuryn … 862080.htm
Some people are doing wonderfully … especially members of the immediate First Family………
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/1025-21.htm
Read and weep. Just for starters……
Halliburton scored almost $1.2 billion in revenue from contracts related to Iraq in the third quarter of 2006, leading one analyst to comment: “Iraq was better than expected … Overall, there is nothing really to question or be skeptical about. I think the results are very good.”Very good indeed. An estimated 655,000 dead Iraqis, over 3,000 dead coalition troops, billions stolen from Iraq’s coffers, a country battered by civil war - but Halliburton turned a profit, so the results are very good.
Very good certainly for Vice President Richard Cheney, who resigned from Halliburton in 2000 with a $33.7 million retirement package (not bad for roughly four years of work). In a stunning conflict of interest, Cheney still holds more than 400,000 stock options in the company. Why pursue diplomacy when you can rake in a personal fortune from war?
Yet Cheney isn’t the only one who has benefited from the Bush administration’s destructive policies. The Bush family has done quite nicely too.
One of my life heroes steps up to the plate:
Protesting in Pictures
Appealing to the Visual Sense Has Long Been a Key Component of Dissent.
by Milton Glaser | LA Times
Dissent is more important now than ever because without it democracy cannot survive. When dissent disappears, the very nature of a democratic society is compromised.
For centuries, people have turned to visual communication as a form of protest. Because this form is so immediate, it can be an extremely powerful means for disseminating messages. Because of the passion behind this type of communication, these messages tend to be expressions of rage or horror.
Unfortunately, anger is not an effective way of convincing others. It tends to communicate only to those people who are already in agreement, and it certifies their beliefs.
If one is interested in changing opinions, other methods must be employed. Provoking a sense of empathy in the viewer that creates a sense of commonality can lead to the idea that we are all in the same boat.
“Child’s Play!” is a poster produced in 1998 in reaction to the killing of a Palestinian boy, and it ignites exactly that empathy. The poster addresses the issue of what happens in war, but in a way that separates it from the political issues. It reminds us that regardless of who’s right and who’s wrong, it is the innocent who suffer.
Even for those who are not generally sympathetic to the Palestinian point of view, the poster’s powerful image penetrates one’s sense of self-righteousness by illustrating war’s horrible consequences.
Humor and parody can also be effective vehicles when linked to consciousness-raising. If, however, the work becomes a vicious satire, it can simply lapse back into rage and lose its strength. Humor has the ability to penetrate minds or engage them because we become interested when things are presented in a funny way. The “Got Oil?” poster is a good example. It relies on knowledge that exists in the viewer’s mind: familiarity with the “Got Milk?” campaign.
Here we see the arresting and scary image of President Bush with oil on his lips. The visceral idea of having oil on one’s lips is disgusting, yet this is an essential part of the power of the image. More important, however, is that the image suggests clearly and unmistakably the idea that war and peace are directly related to issues of oil.
“iRaq” works in much the same way. Again the artist has transformed the elements in a popular ad campaign to great effect. By altering, yet maintaining, each of the elements in their exact position, one cannot miss the irony. In the original advertisement, the iPod headphone wire represents freedom and euphoria, while in the parody it represents ideas of imprisonment and torture.
The most significant challenge in communication is that people frequently do not want to listen to serious messages ? they feel they have heard enough and seen enough. We are constantly assailed and thus spend most of our time deflecting information. We subconsciously develop methodologies for filtering out that which either causes pain or difficulty.
As a result, it is more and more difficult to catch people’s attention ? at a moment when it is increasingly important to do so. We must pay attention and publicly voice our opinions because so much is at stake, and every one of us is responsible for taking an active role in our democratic system.
Milton Glaser, a graphic designer, has had one-man shows at the Centre Georges Pompidou in Paris and the Museum of Modern Art in New York. He is the coauthor of “The Design of Dissent.”
Some of Glaser’s work….
http://www.lawrencewright.com/WrightSoufan.pdf
Did any one else read this article in the NewYorker.
“Did the CIA stop an FBI detective from preventing 9/11?”
“Ali Soufan, as the FBI’s lead investigator on the USS Cole bombing, suspected a larger Al Qaeda plot.”
It seems that US foreign policy (which drove every Western initiative in Central and Eastern Europ) is failing in Central and Eastern Europe as well as in the Middle East. The following is an interesting point of view from Michael Werbowski, a writer in the Czech Republic:
‘New’ Europe Reunites With Its Old Demons
The West introduced market capitalism immediately after the fall of the wall. Its main sales or pitchman was Jeffery Sachs, a brilliant young Harvard professor who was practically anointed as the apostle or father of “shock therapy” in the form of the “new economic theory of the transition.” As Gowan describes it, “a western-directed plan for regional social engineering” to achieve a market economy. At the time, Sachs ran up against skepticism from some eminent thinkers, for example, Baron Ralf Gustav Darendorf.
Instead if imposing an economic model on central Europe, Darendorf, an “old school” German social democrat, argued that the cornerstone for fostering regional growth should be “respecting the existing tissue of social institutions” and strengthening social institutions through “the circulation of ideas and the building of consensus through debate, negotiations and compromise,” explains Gowan, who is professor of International Relations at London Metropolitan University. The legal state where the “rule of law” was supposed to reign has to be established by means of an “open society” or “civil society”; again slogans popularized by “movers and shakers” at the time, such as George Soros. The reality, however, was quite different. Sachs rejected Darendorf’s “open experimentation” in a free society. He feared it would lead the populace down the wrong road toward reform.
When I read this, I said ‘wow’ more than once:
The Death of the Dead Sea
Integrated Regional Information Networks (IRIN)
United Nations
October 16, 2006
As the Dead Sea slowly shrinks towards extinction, fears are growing that the saltiest body of water on earth will not disappear without taking a few lives along with it.
The Dead Sea has fallen more than 20 meters over the past 40 years. Studies by scientists at the University of Jordan have shown that the sea now drops one meter in depth each year. The water level has declined faster than ever since Israel took control of the water resources that feed the Jordan River after occupying the West Bank after the 1967 Arab/Israel war.
“For at least 30 years, Israel diverted most of the Jordan River tributaries and controlled water coming from Tiberias Lake [the Sea of Galilee] in a way that the river level was heavily effected,” said Najib Abu Karaki, head of the geology department at the University of Jordan.
Israel, however, has insisted that its dispute with Jordan over the use of the river was settled in peace agreements, which state that Israel will supply water to Jordan. Israel pumps water from the Sea of Galilee through its Movil Artzi water carrier to be used for irrigation of the Negev and other areas in Israel.
Although the problem of the Dead Sea’s decline starts at the northern borders of Jordan, villagers at the southern edge of the Dead Sea are bearing the full brunt of the problem. Farms have been disappearing to sinkholes caused by the shrinking sea. Villagers lost their homes, cattle and their lives.
“It’s like living on a landmine,” said Jaber Abu Jarrar, 46, a farmer from Ghour Al Haditha village. He lost half his farm to emerging sinkholes.
Almost a week and a half ago, Anna Politkovskaya was killed. I was thinking about free speech and the people around us who really ‘get it’. She was one one of them. Her brutal honestly and well thought-out criticism of Russia and the war on terror had made her famous (of infamous depending on what side of the fence or isle you are on). I posted at least one article of hers in EGOS a few months back, and I have read her often.
There is a cost to free speech, Anna — like thousands before her — paid the price.
Slain Russian Journalist Remembered
Anna Politkovskaya, a U.S.-born Russian journalist known for her opposition to the Chechen conflict and the administration of Russian President Vladimir Putin, was shot dead on Saturday, Oct. 7 in an elevator located in her central Moscow apartment block. Reports have indicated that it was a contract killing carried out by a professional. The mother of two, Politkovskaya was 48 years old.
Politkovskaya reported extensively on the Chechen conflict for Russia’s liberal newspaper, Novaya Gazeta. Her writing was often extremely critical of the Russian government, and fervent in its support for human rights and the rule of law. Her murder caused a strong international reaction.
That’s my assertion.
Good bye due process. Good bye habeas corpus. Hello torture.
“Of the hundreds of detainees being jailed at the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, only 10 have been selected for trial. The indefinite detention of others has been condemned by human rights groups as violating international law.”
You all may recall me talking of this in the past when discussing charity.
So it’s entirely fitting that this year’s Peace Prize was awarded to Muhammad Yunus and his for-profit Grameen Bank. The bank has made tiny business loans to millions of very poor Bangladeshis, improving individual and village life. As the Nobel Committee observed on Friday, “Lasting peace cannot be achieved unless large population groups find ways in which to break out of poverty.”
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1017/p08s02-comv.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6040054.stm
Bush stands by his 30,000 figure of some months back. Meanwhile these very much higher figures come from an extremely reputable medical publication (The Lancet) and the data came via a U.S. university. History has demonstrated that Mr Bush’s sources are often questionable. An exaggeration or closer to the truth than we want to go?
Any thoughts?
As far as the Armenian genocide goes, there is a ton of debate over whether this happened or not. While there is no disputing the fact that a war took place, it is unclear how many people actually died or what the motivation was. Isn’t genocide a motivated and systematic removal of a people?
France of course will because they are entirely against letting Turkey into the EU. What other motivation could there be? In response, Turkey will now counter with a , recognizing the Algeria genocide commit ed by France.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0, … 99,00.html
Jack Straw, our former foreign secretary has said he would prefer Muslim women in his constituency to remove their niqab if the come and see him his MP’s surgery to discuss any matter. He thinks that the niqab or full veil is a barrier to meeting someone.He does however fully support a Muslim’s woman’s right to wear the hijab.His constituency has many. many Muslims and he has previously been keen to show his credentials as being sympathetic to his Muslim constituents ( except of course he was in favour of invading Iraq but that is another issue)
Is he raising a genuine issue or is this yet another attack on Muslims and how we or at least some of us go about things?I have mixed views on this. I wear a hijab but not a full veil. Only about 5% of Muslim’s here in the UK wear the full veil.
I know a fair few- women who wear the full veil most ( but not all) are from the same mosque where it has almost become a Muslim fashion.- or that is how it appears. Initially I did find it a barrier. I wasn’t sure if they were talking to me or what their reaction to something was but it wasn’t long before I no longer saw it as a barrier at all. To me it is just having an open mind and being prepared to make a little more effort. But should others have to make more of an effort and does it make the women who wear them more isolated?
Some I think relish the ” isolation”- people leave them alone and they just communicate with their own. I don’t think this is a healthy way to live. You have to inter react with others all the time at a very basic level whether it is with the clerk in the bank, post office, the cashier in the supermarket, the bus driver etc and to live a life where you don’t communicate with others outside your community makes you have a distorted view of the outside world and also the values of your own community.
All the women I know who wear the niqab wear it from choice not from pressure from family or husbands and I suppose it is a form of personal expression maybe like wearing any outfit whether fashion or extreme fashion .
Do they wear it to blend into the background or to say look at me I’m different- set apart? Other religious groups wear outfits which are a barriers of sorts- a bishop ( men in purple dresses!!) , nun, Sikh, some Jews etc but I suppose none of those outfits hides the face. Is it really more of a barrier than say a punk having multiple safety pins pierced through his or her body?I don’t think so.
I think their are so many issues that need to be addressed concerning integration of Muslims in the UK that it is rather any easy target to start with what we or a very small number of us wear.Also the idea that if we as Muslims speak out against these type of comments we are stifling free speech makes me mad.Why should we allow others to poke us with sticks, pick over our religion and not respond? I want to integrate with others for my own sake but also so my children can see the good and bad in other ways of life. I don’t want to be isolated but I don’t feel I have to conform to what government or others say I must wear. We are not clones we are individuals and should embrace our differences not use them to divide us. { I am not sure why I can’t write without sounding like I am lecturing- I’m sorry}
I would be interested in others views
Something different for discussion. I found this very odd, this “touring” heart.
French saint’s heart makes U.S. debut
By FRANK ELTMAN Associated Press Writer
© 2006 The Associated Press
MERRICK, N.Y. — In life, St. John Vianney was a revered 19th-century French clergyman who was said to be blessed with the ability to read the hearts of worshippers. In death, his own heart has become an object of worship.
For reasons unknown, Vianney’s body never decayed after death, and his heart and body have been encased in separate glass reliquaries in France for more than a century.
The heart is being brought to the U.S. for the first time this weekend to help Long Island’s Cure of Ars church celebrate its 80th anniversary.
The rest of the story.